At its outset, DNF was not as solid as many would have liked,īut Fedora users worked the kinks out of it, and it became stable enough toīe used in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux products as well.Ĭhange proposal was posted, describing a plan to replace DNF with theĮntirely new DNF5 package manager. Lead to the creation of wrecked systems, which is seen as generally Given its central role, DNF has to be solid the alternative would likely Hat) system, DNF is probably invoked by users much more often than RPM is. Repositories, manages system updates, and more. Managing the software mix on the system as a whole. The replacement, called DNF5, was slated to be a part of theįedora 39 release, due in October, but that is not going to happen.ĭNF sits on top of the RPM package manager and handles higher-level tasks, Mean one thing: it must be time to throw it away and start over from theīeginning. Stabilized over the years, though and the complaints have subsided. In as a replacement for Yum but got off to a Manager is not the favorite tool of many Fedora users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |